Hannah's adventures in trying to find an iPhone app that will provide a sufficient level of granularity for detailed route tracking.

 

App 1: Trails

Cost: 2.49 ($3.99)

Url: http://trails.lamouroux.de/

 

Advantages: export gpx file directly by email. Nameable tracks. Shiny UI

 

Disadvantages: Minimum distance between waypoint recording is 5m, no API access

 

0gps_visualizer_google_maps_out

 

 

App 2: Instamapper GPS Tracker

Cost: free

URL: http://instamapper.com/

 

Advantages: live tracking via the site, API access, increase 'accuracy' to 20m (to eliminate any other sources of location, cell towers, etc). Decent security and privacy options.

 

Disadvantages: Need to export data using an API (which includes UNIX timestamp, this converter useful for that! http://www.onlineconversion.com/unix_time.htm). Need to have app running and open to be sending data. Haven't trialled whether it queues data for sending upon opening, but this might mean no multitasking. No control over the intervals of waypoints, in some cases minutes before the next point is recorded.

 

Instamapper_-_gps_tracking

 

App 3: GPS Stone [recommended]

Price: £2.99

URL: http://itunes.apple.com/uy/app/gps-stone-gpx-trip-tracking/id441456344?mt=8

 

pros: shiny UI, record point every 1m or 1 second (and can set either to null), export to GPX by mail, pause and stop recording options, live map view

 

cons: no API access, no apparent control over accuracy beyond just a '50m' on/off switch, though this is probably enough to remove most cellular source stuff, maybe?

 

Gps_visualizer_google_maps_out

"Hacking is an idea, as well as a social movement, [...] Hacking is a DIY culture of action — [...]

"Hacking is an idea, as well as a social movement, which is about subverting and reclaiming the tools and metaphors that we’re given. Hacking is a DIY culture of action — a very individualistic community, but still a community with a vision of shared benefits."

From a free-to-download book called 'emotional cartography', which is sort of about cities, art, tech, and, y'know, people. (via)

Boal and the Master Swimmer

Read the full Political Master Swimmer here.

"Boal addresses the absurdity of privileging the idea of a person over actual individuals, universal Man over specific people, in an allegorical story (Boal 1994: 134). A much beloved master swimmer, who had saved many people from watery deaths, was walking by a swimming pool when he heard the cries of a drowning man. The master swimmer told the drowning man that as soon as at least 20 people were drowning he would save them because he was a political master swimmer. Boal thus captures how the abstract notion of the political can obscure the needs of actual people."

p.111 Jan Cohen-Cruz “Redefining the Private, From Personal Storytelling to Politcal Act” in A Boal Companion, Dialogues on Theatre and Cultural Politics edited by Jan Cohen-Cruz and Mady Schutzman. (Routledge, Oxon: 2006)

urk, OK, looks like my post on the riots has made my site fall over. Here's a repost on someone else's server (posterous)

I can understand them. (reposted somewhere scalable) 

Riot

I can understand them.

I shouldn’t have to couch this in apologies about not condoning of course. But I will.

Because there is a difference. I wouldn’t do it. But I can understand it.

Because actually I think the most important thing is trying to understand it, and the reason this is happening is because people don’t or can’t try to understand people; they’re just ‘mindless’ ‘scum’ ‘youths’ ‘black’ ‘pigs’ ‘anarchists’ ‘protestors’ ‘chavs’ ‘lazy’ ‘stupid’ ‘fuzz’ or one of any number of words that means ‘them not us’.

Every day in many ways you are told about what you should have. What you should wear, the kind of phone, the brand of trainers, the size of TV. But not you. You don’t have the money. We’ll give you the aspiration. The one for the stuff, mind, not skills or education, we don’t want you thinking about it. And we don’t tell you that it’s an empty addiction, that it’s never enough. And every now and then we flash a golden ticket in front of your eyes, a game show, a talent contest, a lottery. Take a chance, they say, life is just a game of snakes and ladders and you may just hit the ladder that takes you all the way to the top.

Brands aren’t people. They’re massive. There are no real people behind that.

And there are whispers of people getting something for nothing

And then it’s a corner shop, not a chain, it’s someone’s livelihood. But after you’ve broken one window, why not another, what’s stopping you? And it feels so good, it makes you feel strong, you’re having an effect. Mostly people look down on you, you can see it in their eyes. Now they’re afraid of you. Scared. You’re on the news. On TV, it’s reality tv where you dictate the camera angles.

You don’t hear or feel the fear of the people in the houses, not out on the streets.

You just feel the pounding of the blood and ringing of the alarms in your ears and your body feels like it’s vibrating. You feel strong. You feel like you could do anything. So you do.

‘you’re just trashing your own community’, so what? No one else gives a fuck about it, why should you. (Ever heard of self harm?)

Looting is an act of aggression against the rules of capitalism. A rejection of the label ‘have not’.

You might not phrase it like that

“I’m hungry, I come and I ask for food, I say please. Every day. I come and I see you’ve got lots of it, more than you need. Days, years, decades I come by. Keep on saying please. Year’s we’ve been asking the government. One day I’m just going to take it.” (paraphrasing an interview from the streets of Hackneyhttp://boo.fm/b433800)

People will get hurt. Houses and goods and livelihoods will be broken. People will be jailed, mothers will lose their sons and police officers’ families won’t sleep, wondering if they’ll take another brick or bottle to the face.

And a thousand more things I couldn’t possibly really understand.

But that doesn’t mean I shouldn’t try.

A broken society is built on the failure of imagination of both government and people.

Stay safe.

@thehuxcapacitor @simonralphgoff RE ToS and copyright; a small rant on loss of context

This is how I understand the scaremongering, though by all means run it past a lawyer: 
it's almost always the same thing; they take that 'share produce perform and make derivative works' quote out of context. Here's how it continues in dropbox's instance:

"to the extent reasonably necessary for the Service. This license is solely to e

nable us to technically administer, display, and operate the Services." 

- using your content in any other way than sharing and displaying between computers etc is not 'reasonably necessary for the service'. The only way it could be stretched that I would feel uncomfortable with is in advertising. It notes derivative works as being 'translations' - maybe a feature they're thinking of bringing in. And states at the very beginning of the section 

"By using our Services you may give us access to your information, files, and folders (together, “your stuff”). You retain ownership to your stuff."

This same ToS is on pretty much every image sharing service, youtube, facebook, it's very standard and says nothing about removing your ownership/copyright, but makes it possible for many services to operate in a sharing age.

Not that I think that all these companies are angels or anything, or that it couldn't be abused. But as it stands, these clauses do not remove any of your copyright, and without exception include qualifiers that would be easy to uphold in a court of law... plus, y'know, I'd much rather that if my laptop crashed, or my house was burgled and laptop and HD taken, I could still access my vital and lasting documents online.

</rant>

I like this description of walking by that Michel de Certeau fellah:

Nightwalk-6

"The ordinary practitioners of the city live "down below," below the thresholds at which visibility begins. They walk -- an elementary form of this experience of the city; they are walkers, Wandersmanner, whose bodies follow the thicks and thins of an urban "text" they write without being able to read it. These practitioners make use of spaces that cannot be seen; their knowledge of them is as blind as that of lovers in each other's arms. The paths that correspond in this intertwining, unrecognized poems in which each body is an element signed by many others, elude legibility. It is as though the practices organizing a bustling city were characterized by their blindness. The networks of these moving, intersecting writings compose a manifold story that has neither author nor spectator, shaped out of fragments of trajectories and alterations of spaces: in relation to representations, it remains daily and indefinitely other."

(p.93 The Practice of Everyday Life)